Imagine a student ten years after college graduation: what would it mean for that student to be scientifically literate? In our view, scientifically literate students have a set of basic skills that allow them to:
- Access the scientific information they need when confronting a real-world problem or question.
- Critique claims that utilize scientific evidence and, in particular, to reconcile conflicting claims about scientific evidence,
- Understand human factors that influence the creation, interpretation, and communication of scientific evidence; and
- Integrate thinking scientifically about a question with knowledge from other fields.
The authors lay out a definition of science literacy with foundations in public engagement in science, supported by evidence about how people actually use science in their everyday lives.
|
Feinstein argues that there is little evidence that efforts to improve science literacy have an impact on people’s lives, and presents a model of how to educate students as competent outsiders to science, rather than marginal insiders.
|
Like Feinstein’s approach, ours is founded on lifelong utility: we take seriously the fact that our students—including many non-majors who take only one science course in college—will one day encounter scientifically-informed problems later in life. What should we teach them? We were further drawn to his work because, unlike most approaches to science literacy, his is informed by data on how adults actually use science in their lives. We made the decision that an evidence-based approach to science literacy was fundamental.
There are other serious approaches to the question of science literacy at the college level:
There are other serious approaches to the question of science literacy at the college level:
Civic science literacy
|
Science literacy at Oberlin College
|
Science for all in a core curriculum: Frontiers of Science at Columbia University
|
Science matters: Achieving scientific literacy
|
OUR
THINKING |
On the face of it, these definitions of science literacy all look quite similar. At an early moment in our work, we decided that our choice of a definition had to be founded on real evidence about whether and how knowledge of science makes a difference in people’s lives. We also realized that even the perfect definition wouldn’t help our students achieve science literacy if it wasn’t taught appropriately.
Questions we asked ourselves:
|